<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>diginc &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diginc.us/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diginc.us</link>
	<description>\'dij-iŋk\</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spamato vs SpamBayes [Win7]</title>
		<link>http://diginc.us/2009/10/spamato-vs-spambayes-win7/</link>
		<comments>http://diginc.us/2009/10/spamato-vs-spambayes-win7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>diginc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spamato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpamBayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diginc.us/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which spam prevention product wins: SpamBayes vs Spamato? SpamBayes is the clear winner in my mind. I used Spamato with my outlook 2007 first and recently switched to Spambayes because Spamato simply wouldn&#8217;t work with Windows 7 even after going &#8230; <a href="http://diginc.us/2009/10/spamato-vs-spambayes-win7/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which spam prevention product wins: <a href="http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/">SpamBayes</a> vs <a href="www.spamato.net">Spamato</a>?  SpamBayes is the clear winner in my mind.</p>
<p>I used Spamato with my outlook 2007 first and recently switched to Spambayes because Spamato simply wouldn&#8217;t work with Windows 7 even after going through an enormous hassle of <a href="http://saranspot.blogspot.com/2009/02/installing-dotnet-framework-11-on.html">hacking Microsoft&#8217;s .NET Framework 1.1 installer</a> to get it to install in Windows 7.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really glad I switched, SpamBayes has amazing accuracy when trained with your Spam/Ham folders.  It even has a &#8216;Junk Suspects&#8217; folder which has caught all (1 or 2) my ham messages which is mistook for spam.  I don&#8217;t think any Ham has ended up in the Junk folder unless it was an automated mail/newsletter and those quickly stopped going to junk after useing the &#8216;recovering from spam&#8217; toolbar button to improve training.</p>
<p>I used Spamato for more than a year and it works fairly well, I liked it and recommended it to others.  Every time I recommended it to a non technical person I cringed a little bit after remembering the fact that it requires a couple, not so simple to explain over the phone, prerequisites.</p>
<p>The finite accuracy seems better in SpamBayes and the installation is definitely a hell of a lot easier than Spamato.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diginc.us/2009/10/spamato-vs-spambayes-win7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook 2007: None of the Authentication Methods Supported By This Client Are Supported By Your Server</title>
		<link>http://diginc.us/2009/02/outlook-2007-none-of-the-authentication-methods-supported-by-this-client-are-supported-by-your-server/</link>
		<comments>http://diginc.us/2009/02/outlook-2007-none-of-the-authentication-methods-supported-by-this-client-are-supported-by-your-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>diginc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug by Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2k7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMTP Authentication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diginc.us/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#8217;t send from certain locations and keep having to turn on/off outgoing server SMTP Authentication in outlook 2007? You might see this error too: &#8220;None of the Authentication Methods Supported By This Client Are Supported By Your Server&#8221; My Answer: &#8230; <a href="http://diginc.us/2009/02/outlook-2007-none-of-the-authentication-methods-supported-by-this-client-are-supported-by-your-server/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t send from certain locations and keep having to turn on/off outgoing server SMTP Authentication in outlook 2007?  You might see this error too: &#8220;<strong>None of the Authentication Methods Supported By This Client Are Supported By Your Server</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>My Answer:  Goto Email Accounts, Change the problem account, More Settings, Outgoing Server tab, and check outgoing server require authentication and choose &#8220;Log on to incoming mail server before sending mail&#8221; instead of &#8220;Use same settings as incoming&#8221; &#8211; Outlook 2007 is the first and only mail program to require any of our mail servers to use this setting.  So far I&#8217;ve only confirmed the problem to be on older sendmail servers.  There can be other solutions to this error message but this is one I find most often resolves it.</p>
<p>The Question:  As a systems administrator I take calls for our tech support queue and one user called with a really odd problem.  Basically it&#8217;s detailed here:</p>
<p>http://thepursuitofalife.com/outlook-2007-error-none-of-the-authentication-methods-supported-by-this-client-are-supported-by-your-server/</p>
<p>Like the above link describes the user would have to disable SMTP auth in certain locations (That&#8217;s a workaround, not the solution), even though all our servers require SMTP authentication.  The above link eventually shares the true solution but it&#8217;s buried under many comments thanking the poster for the work around.  So I decided to help fellow googlers by making this post.</p>
<p>Update: Comments about other people&#8217;s experience with this error made me want to add my further experience with it.  I&#8217;ve seen this error a lot more often since I first made this post and am convinced it&#8217;s really some sort of bug with Outlook 2007.  Some people cannot get rid of the error and have to continually switch between &#8220;Log on to incoming mail server before sending mail&#8221; and &#8220;Use same settings as incoming&#8221; to keep outlook sending correctly.   Whereas if they switch to Windows Mail (The Vista and Windows 7 equivalent of outlook express) they never need to do anything but set &#8216;use same settings as incoming&#8217; and never have any problem sending.  If it&#8217;s not a &#8217;2007 Bug&#8217; then it&#8217;s definitely a Outlook 2007 incompatibility with certain MTAs &#8211; specifically (maybe just older) sendmail &#8211; our postfix servers don&#8217;t seem to have this bug, but like I just said only 2007 has this incompatibility so you can&#8217;t entirely blame sendmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diginc.us/2009/02/outlook-2007-none-of-the-authentication-methods-supported-by-this-client-are-supported-by-your-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 &#8211; What I do after installing</title>
		<link>http://diginc.us/2009/01/windows-7-what-i-do-after-installing/</link>
		<comments>http://diginc.us/2009/01/windows-7-what-i-do-after-installing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>diginc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diginc.us/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought I&#8217;d make a list of applications I usually need after a fresh windows install and what order I install them in. Since this time I&#8217;m using Windows 7 (W7) Beta I&#8217;ll be commenting about major differences I take &#8230; <a href="http://diginc.us/2009/01/windows-7-what-i-do-after-installing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I&#8217;d make a list of applications I usually need after a fresh windows install and what order I install them in.  Since this time I&#8217;m using Windows 7 (W7) Beta I&#8217;ll be commenting about major differences I take notice of about W7 along the way too &#8211; I&#8217;ve had tastes of Vista before so I know my way around their new control panel and other menu changes.  Note I&#8217;m running the 64-bit version so some of my links are to 64-bit apps/drivers.</p>
<p>Windows 7 bugged me about anti virus right away so I grabbed that first&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-25"></span><br />
<a href="http://free.avg.com/">AVG Free</a><br />
<a href="http://ie7.com/">Firefox 3</a><br />
Nvidia video drivers, found out they&#8217;re integrated in windows update for W7 Beta.<br />
<a href="http://www.uvnc.com/download/">UltraVNC</a> (for work)<br />
<a href="http://store.steampowered.com/about/">Steam</a> (For Team Fortress 2 and Left 4 Dead)<br />
Set my workgroup to reach my samba shares (control panel > system > change settings > workgroup)</p>
<p>W7 Then bugged me about a product key so I registered a windows live account and they emailed me one after a few steps through their site (Looks like they haven&#8217;t run out of their 2.5M keys yet)</p>
<p>While I was browsing some websites I noticed something foreign to me&#8230;ads, I realized I had forgotten the holy grail of Firefox addons, <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865">adblock+</a> and <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1136">Filterset.g</a>.  Continuing my application installs&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://asia.creative.com/support/downloads/download.asp?MainCategory=1&#038;nRegionFK=&#038;nCountryFK=&#038;nLanguageFK=&#038;sOSName=Windows+Vista+64-bit&#038;region=2&#038;Product_Name=X-Fi+XtremeMusic&#038;Product_ID=14066&#038;modelnumber=&#038;driverlang=1033&#038;OS=27&#038;drivertype=0&#038;x=18&#038;y=9">Creative SBX-Fi Drivers</a><br />
<a href="http://www.foobar2000.org/">Foobar 2000</a> (music)<br />
<a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/">VLC</a> (video)<br />
<a href="http://www.cccp-project.net/">CCCP</a> (Video Codecs &#038; MPC)<br />
<a href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/434/180&#038;cl=us,en?osid=13">Logitech G15</a> Keyboard Drivers.<br />
<a href="http://www.ventrilo.com/download.php">Ventrilo</a><br />
<a href="http://www.rarlab.com/download.htm">WinRar</a> (surprised I didn&#8217;t need it before now!)<br />
<a href="http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php">Foxit Reader</a> (Free Adobe Acrobat replacement &#038; improvement)<br />
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/davidayton/CDisplay">CDisplay</a> (aka Comic Book Reader)</p>
<p>I then &#8220;unpinned&#8221; Window Media Player and Internet Explorer from W7&#8242;s new taskbar and pinned Foobar and FF3 instead.  The new taskbar is a nice merger of quick launch icons and task bars applications.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diginc.us/2009/01/windows-7-what-i-do-after-installing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
